Although I have yet to see a memo or piece of written policy, suffice it to say that the ban of service BDUs has been made official through the actions of the NUCC CoC (Chain of Command).
For the past week or so, the latest rumor on the hill has been the true destruction of Service Uniform Tuesdays. One cadet, not even enrolled in ROTC, was marked APOD from the formation he was standing in ... for wearing his service ACUs. This has expanded to include the Coast Guard option cadets, and any uniform with a Reserve Unit or National Guard patch.

Right. It's not like he showed up in a bathrobe (which I've seen). I believe cadets
skip miss enough formations without being marked APOD from the ones they actually bother to attend, not to mention for reasons of a policy which, to my knowledge is unpublished and undistributed. If someone could help me find this in writing, I shall gladly rescind the previous comment.
Besides, what is so offensive about a flag patch? What is so threatening about the cadets that took that initiative? What is wrong with cadets that are
really in the "service" wearing their "service" uniforms and showing it?

Don't tell me it's for uniformity, because if that's the case you'd better choose one ROTC for the school to keep and pitch the others, since the Marines have their digi's; the Navy, their Khakis; the Air Force, their
pajamas flight suits. What brought on this sudden change?
It amazes me. These things should be
encouraged, not
banned. Is it just me, or does this strike anyone else as backasswards?
This just tells the real soldiers (read as: those wearing service uniforms) that the initiative they took is not important to the Corps. That the training they did does not matter.
As for the cadets without service uniforms to wear ... do you
care if those that have them, wear them? My guess would be 'no.' Correct me if I'm wrong. You'd be in Cadet ROTC uniform or Norwich fields. That being said, who
does care? Who cares enough ... so much, in fact, as to ban them entirely?
It wasn't a "we're better than you" concept, but a "wear 'em if you got 'em" idea.
Here's some food for thought:
Banning the wear of the uniform does not devalue thier experiences & units to
them ... they know what
they've gone through ... but it may just have an effect on how they view the Corps. Perhaps that was the desired outcome of the policy?
Keep in mind that every rule, regulation and policy made in any institution makes a statement about that institution itself. The reporting of honor violations, for example, shows that the principles of honor and integrity are valued at Norwich. Not wearing hats in the mess hall or spitting on the UP are enforced because respect is also valued here.
Cadets are not authorized to wear service uniforms other than ROTC cadet uniforms anymore on Tuesdays.
What statement does this make in reference to the institution's views on the
service?
You Tell Me!
This entry brought to you by the CoC, yours truly, the Norwich University Corps of Cadets and by viewers like you.